Page 3, 8th February 1980

8th February 1980

Page 3

Page 3, 8th February 1980 — Prison acts on Herald letters
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: London

Share


Related articles

Why The Ira Bomb Expert Is Now The `true Penitent'

Page 7 from 18th January 1980

Compassion For The Criminal

Page 4 from 21st December 1979

Soul-searching In The Scrubs

Page 7 from 15th November 1985

My Time Behind Bars In Brixton Jail

Page 12 from 10th June 1994

Privileges Lost

Page 4 from 25th January 1980

Prison acts on Herald letters

By Beth Webb THE AUTHORITIES at Wormwood Scrubs prison in London are stopping mail sent to Mr Shane O'Doherty in response to two letters that he wrote to the Herald.
In his letters Mr O'Doherty appealed. for a realistic and Christian understanding of prisoners as people. He is currently serving a life sentence for his involvement in an IRA letter bomb campaign. The letters caused him to lose two weeks' privileges.
According to Home Office rules, prisoners may only correspond with relatives and friends who they knew prior to their imprisonment as well as MPs and members of the House of Lords. Since the Herald published the letters readers' replies have been returned with a printed letter from the assistant prison governor saying: "S. O'Doherty's letter .. . was unauthorised and he is therefore not allowed to receive any correspondence referring to it."
A Home Office spokesperson said that all letters are a "privilege": "In prison, everything apart from eating, sleeping and exercise is a privilege: even the possession of a pen or radio is a privilege because they are not essential to health," she said.
She would not comment on the findings of the Howard League for Penal Reform that the receipt and writing of letters is vital for the rehabilitation of the offender.
Despite the Home Office rules about who may write to a prisoner, a member of the Social Welfare Commission's Penal Affairs Committee, Professor Terence Morris. managed to persuade the Home Office to allow him to correspond with Mr O'Doherty.
When asked why Professor Morris was allowed to correspond with Mr O'Doherty, while others w,ho were neither cranks nor criminal contacts were not allowed to communicate with the prisoner at all, the spokesperson said: "I really don't know, we can't discuss individual prisoners, I've told you the rules.'




blog comments powered by Disqus