Page 4, 5th August 1994

5th August 1994

Page 4

Page 4, 5th August 1994 — Freemasons defended and accused
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Cancer Fund, Freemasonry
People: Michael Petek
Locations: Leeds, London

Share


Related articles

English Freemasonry : Has Rome Got It Wrong?

Page 4 from 6th March 1998

Freemasons Lost In The Moral Maze

Page 4 from 2nd September 1994

Nolan Committee Replies

Page 7 from 14th September 2001

The Blasphemous Oaths Of Freemasonry

Page 4 from 15th July 1994

Catholic Seeks To Transform The Image Of Freemasonry

Page 2 from 29th November 2002

Freemasons defended and accused

IN 'I'HE INTEREST OF truth, Michael Petek's letter on freemasonry (Catholic Herald, 15 July) cannot go uncorrected.
Freemasons do not swear oaths; they make serious promises (obligations) regarding their duties to God, the law, their families and society in general.
Those obligations no longer contain physical penalties, which had always been symbolic.
Freemasonry does not claim "to be the custodian of spiritual secrets or mysteries".
In Freemasonry, the word "mysteries" is used in its medieval sense of a trade or handicraft secret.
The "secrets or mysteries" of Freemasonry are simply the modes of ,recognition (signs and words) used as a proof of membership when visiting a lodge where you are not known.
Freemasons do not bind themselves not to disclose internal lodge affairs.
Official spokesmen have on many occasions, both in print and on the air, discussed what happens at meetings and Grand Lodge has readily assisted many authorities enquiring into Freemasonry in general or specific allegations of supposed Masonic corruption.
JM Hamill Librarian and Curator Library and Museum of the United Grand Lodge of England London
As A CATHOLIC AND Freemason with a clear conscience, I would like to reply to the rather uncharitable letter from Michael Petek (Catholic Herald, 15 July).
His argumentp are, I fear,
i
based on false p emises.
To say that the Masonic initiate binds I himself to unlawful penalti just plainly untr so, the rest of does not hold w Further, a F expected to uph the land on pain Even the Cathol longer goes this Freemasonry, organisation i members raise their own reso than from outsi
In 1993, just Charity helped poor circumst tune of L11,594,1 housing £50,00 Cancer Fund £100,000 betw Aged and Ag £250,000 in fn. 274 registered £175, 300 to 139 hospices including many under Catholic jurisdiction, none of which refused donations due to their source.
If supporting eh a worthy organisation is "grave sin", then I am p oud to be condemned b him, well knowing that n the final event, God will e my judge. Douglas E' Jug/es ta
s of death is C. This being e argument ter. eemason is ld the law of of expulsion. C Church no far.
S a charitable which the funds from rces rather e.
me Masonic dividuals in nces to the 90, sheltered , Macmillan
£100,000,
en Help the Concern. or grants to arities, and Guiseley, Leeds




blog comments powered by Disqus