Page 9, 27th August 2004

27th August 2004

Page 9

Page 9, 27th August 2004 — Woolly thinking
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

People: Jim Allen

Share


Related articles

The Wooly Thinking Of The Careless Mind

Page 8 from 20th August 2004

There Is No Excuse For Being A Dithering Catholic

Page 16 from 2nd February 2007

Views On Singer

Page 11 from 24th October 2008

Quiz Complaint

Page 11 from 7th September 2007

Quentin De La Bedoyere Science And Faith

Page 9 from 9th May 2008

Woolly thinking

From Mr Jim Allen SIR – I much enjoyed Quentin de la Bédoyère’s exposure of woolly thinking and the deceitful use of words in the embryo debate (August 20). Let me put something forward from that most “unwoolly” of books, the Bible.
In Jeremiah 1:5, the Lord says to his future prophet, “Before I formed thee in the bowels of thy mother, I knew thee: and before thou camest out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and made thee a prophet unto the nations.” This shows that, even if very few of us are called to such illustrious service, each one of us, with our own individual characteristics, was in the mind of God through all eternity.
He cherishes and forms us throughout our lives (“The hairs of your head are numbered”). Anyone who frustrates or destroys this plan, at any stage whatsoever, commits a very serious sin indeed.
It makes no difference if the unborn child looks like a tiny blob of jelly or has recognisable human form; to destroy it is to defy God’s intention in the serious matter of creating a human being.
Do these considerations not bypass all the complicated arguments about “personhood” and “ensoulment” and make them redundant?
Yours faithfully JIM ALLEN Torquay, Devon




blog comments powered by Disqus