Page 13, 25th September 2009
25th September 2009
Page 13
Page 13, 25th September 2009
— The ire of Pullman
Close
Report an error
Noticed an error on this page?If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.
Tags
People:
WILLIAM DENNETT, Philip Pullman
Share
Related articles
Pullman: New Assault On The Church
Page 1 from 19th March 2004
Professor Offers A Riposte To Philip Pullman
Page 16 from 20th August 2010
Director Cuts Anti God Vitriol From Film
Page 3 from 24th December 2004
Closing Children's Minds
Page 10 from 1st February 2002
Bishops Withdraw Review Of Pullman Film After Protests
Page 5 from 21st December 2007
The ire of Pullman
Keywords:
Philosophy, Academia, Atheism, Agnosticism, Philip Pullman, Pullman, Belief, Secularism, Dennett, Religion / Belief
From Mr William Dennett Why is Philip Pullman (Report, September 11) always referred to as an “atheist”? Since the sole object of his ire is Christianity, would it not be more correct to term him as “antiChristian”?
Like many so-called secularists and atheists nowadays, he is very comfortable in his attacks on people who, by the nature of their beliefs, are unlikely to offer him more than a cup of tea and a mild rebuke, but never a word is heard relating to other major world religions.
Yours faithfully, WILLIAM DENNETT By email
blog comments powered by Disqus