Page 1, 1st May 1964

1st May 1964

Page 1

Page 1, 1st May 1964 — M.P.s worried over Malta referendum
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

In Malta

Page 5 from 22nd May 1964

Way Is Clear For Peace In Malta

Page 1 from 6th April 1956

Pastoral Letter Did Not Condemn It

Page 1 from 3rd February 1956

The Real Aims Of Mr. Mintoff

Page 5 from 8th May 1964

It Will Be A Near Thing In Maltese Vote

Page 1 from 23rd December 1955

M.P.s worried over Malta referendum

ARBITRATION PLEA
By a Commonwealth Correspondent
ON the eve of the Malta referendum, Catholic M.P.s on both sides of the House of Commons are worried about the impression created here by Maltese Church leaders' views on Church-State relations in the island. A number of parliamentary questions, recently put to Mr. Duncan Sandys, give special point to their anxiety.
The Maltese Prime Minister, Dr. Borg Olivier, goes to the island's electorate this weekend with a constitution for Maltese independence, prepared by his Nationalist government. It omits a series of amendment clauses proposed by Mr. Dom Mintoff's Malta Labour Party, but resisted by the other five parties, which see these clauses as a threat to the island's religious life.
Dr. Borg Olivier has publicly stated that, if he secures a majority in the referendum, no one will be able to introduce any clauses in the independence constitution which are not approved by the Church. He indicated explicitly that this was meant for Mr. Sandys's ears.
Mr. Sandys has told the House of Commons here, however, that the Westminster government has in no way guaranteed that no clauses will be inserted without Maltese approval. This presumably means that, if he saw fit to insert the Mintoff amendments, he would do so without reference to the Maltese vote.
Inconclusive poll ?
Without holding a brief for Mr. Minton', Catholic M.P.s in London find it difficult to see anything inherently objectionable in the amendments. They are distressed because many nonCatholic M.P.s, without being in any way unsympathetic to the Church, feel, rightly or wrongly, that she is claiming more than her proper field of spiritual sovereignty.
On the other hand, the Maltese Nationalists and Church leaders argue that the amendments must be read in the very special context of a wholly Catholic community, and that their innocent appearance conceals threats to public morality, the Church's rights in education, and the island's Catholic way of life.
There is a danger that the referendum may be inconclusive, because, while Labour will vote "no", many centre party supporters will abstain. The question put to the voters is simply whether or not they want Borg Olivier's constitution. Some may vote "no", not because they object to the constitution, but because, with the island's centre parties, they feel Malta is not ripe for independence.
Meanwhile, the Maltese Bishops have issued a statement, calling for prayers on the eve of the referendum, but stating that the independence question is not one for their intervention (see below). Underlying the whole of the island's future, however, is the persisting conflict between the Church and the Labour Party. Catholic M.P.s in Britain believe that the gap could still be bridged by arbitration, and are most anxious that new steps should be taken to that end.




blog comments powered by Disqus