Page 3, 17th March 1967

17th March 1967
Page 3
Page 3, 17th March 1967 — Spiller of beans

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.


Locations: London, Oxford


Related articles

An Honourable View Of A Rebel

Page 5 from 20th July 1984

Elizabeth Countess Of Longford

Page 2 from 1st November 2002

Splendid Isolation

Page 15 from 16th January 2009

Shop Assistant Serves Herself Well

Page 8 from 13th January 1950

Low Life

Page 11 from 28th February 2003

Spiller of beans

DOLLY TOYNBEE is the Oxford undergraduate who spilt the Amnesty beans. But it's not the first sensational happening she's got herself involved in during her twenty years on this earth.

She's been officially expelled from Rhodesia for refusing information to the police, published a novel called "Left Overs", all about eleven young people in London, the sole survivors of a war, and called Oxford "an archaic institution" in an article in the New Statesman.

A couple of weeks ago she disclosed that Amnesty International had received money from the British Government for relief work in Rhodesia. Since Amnesty prides itself on being a strictly non-political organisation this was a pretty serious charge, and the shockwaves which Polly's disclosure generated have not settled yet.

She thinks that Amnesty has been "bought off" by the British Government. "Instead of dealing with legal test cases, it is wasting its time on welfare work which could equally well be done by the Red Cross," she says. Polly, daughter and granddaughter of writers—her father

is the Observer critic Philip Toynbee—puts her first love as writing with acting and music—"Mozart, Scarlatti and classical jazz"—a close second.

In spite of her criticisms of Oxford she enjoys life there and studies hard for the history degree she will take. "After all," Polly Toynbee muses, "I did come here primarily to work."

"In D.W.'s review-article last week on the R.C.s by George Scott, he referred to Catholic societies in a sentence which suggested that a non-Catholic could not be expected to know exactly what weight or lack of weight to attach to papal declarations. This .should, of course, read 'decorations.' " From the Tablet.

blog comments powered by Disqus