Page 3, 17th December 1982

17th December 1982

Page 3

Page 3, 17th December 1982 — Schools contest bishops' amalgamation proposals
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: London

Share


Related articles

Bishops' Schools Plan Criticised

Page 3 from 12th October 1984

Blunder Holds Up Schools Amalgamation

Page 3 from 19th October 1984

Teachers Reject Plans For London Schools

Page 1 from 10th December 1982

Hard Decision For Bishops

Page 1 from 3rd December 1982

Governors Slam School Plan

Page 1 from 21st January 1983

Schools contest bishops' amalgamation proposals

by Jonathan Petre THE WESTMINSTER diocese's plan for the reorganisation of Catholic secondary schools in West London fails to provide a proper comprehensive curriculum, and perpetuates a grammar school ethos in the minds of the general public, according to a working party representing staff of four schools facing amalgamation under the bishops' proposals.
And the governors of St Thomas More School in Chelsea this week expressed dissatisfaction with the bishops' proposals. After a meeting earlier this week, Mr Antony Bartlett, chairman of the governors, said: "We are not happy with the bishops' proposals, chiefly because no explanation was sent with it. The bishops' plan does not conform to their original one."
It is understood that Bishop David Konstant, chairman of the Education Commission, has now sent a letter to the headmaster of St Thomas More which provides a more detailed explanation of the reasons behind the bishops' proposals. Cardinal Hume is also expected to release a statement in the near future.
The working party, which is made up of 12 staff members from Cardinal Manning, Sion Manning, St Edmund's and St Thomas More, met this week and issued a statement rejecting the reorganisation plan.
The statement says: "This plan does not provide a proper curriculum. It perpetuates a grammar school ethos in the minds of the general public. It fails to provide enough places for girls in Division One (of Inner London Education Authority) and so endangers the concept of equal opportunities.
"The original plan of Mr Newsam (formally of the ILEA) was rejected at the outset by the Schools Commission but have now been accepted by the bishops three years later without explanation or consultation!,




blog comments powered by Disqus