Page 4, 9th February 2001

9th February 2001
Page 4
Page 4, 9th February 2001 — Americas
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Law Lords Back Bbc In Censorship Row

Page 3 from 18th April 2003

Bereavement—a Pound Of Cure Or Ounce Of Prevention?

Page 7 from 28th June 1985

The Mother Or Camera Studies Of The

Page 1 from 2nd November 1951

No Moral Or Scriptural Objection To New Technique To Aid...

Page 1 from 13th January 1956

The Great Debate

Page 2 from 23rd November 1951

Americas

Inhuman judgement

A CANADIAN judge has ruled that a full-term baby who died during childbirth was "not human".

Justice Patricia Rowbotham told the bereaved couple that the law did not consider their child to be a human baby. She said that the child possessed no legal status until it was "born alive and viable".

The parents were awarded damages for the doctor's admitted negligence, but were refused an additional sum to compensate for their bereavement at the death of their child.

Gwen Landoll, a lawyer for REAL women Canada, condemned the decision as a "legal fiction" denying the humanity of the unborn child. She questioned the competence of a court which could flagrantly oppose medical and scientific facts.




blog comments powered by Disqus