Page 8, 7th May 1976

7th May 1976
Page 8
Page 8, 7th May 1976 — by WILLIAM BURRIDGE, W.F.
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Not That Bad

Page 6 from 23rd July 1982

Scripture Studies

Page 6 from 16th January 1970

Pacifism May Become The New Orthodoxy

Page 11 from 2nd May 2008

Aquinas Scholar And Historian

Page 3 from 29th July 1988

Spoilt For Choice

Page 6 from 15th November 1996

by WILLIAM BURRIDGE, W.F.

Light on the Epistles by John L. McKenzie (Thomas More Press $8.95) John L. McKenzie, the noted American Biblical scholar, is perhaps best known outside the professional circles of his subject for his "Dictionary of the Bible". The same command of his material combined with his power of concise expression which enabled him to produce it is evident in this very readable reader's guide to the Epistles.

The problem, as he realises so well, in writing this kind of book is that it can start a chain reaction of questions in the reader which have to be left unprovided for through lack of space. Even massive commentaries cannot exhaust them all. What he has decided on is to explain, along with the authorship, the purpose of each Epistle and the main points it makes as it goes along.

He gives a general and indispensable introduction of some 40 pages and the remainder of the 210 pages is shared out according to the length

and/or importance of the content of each Epistle.

The readers who are going to get full worth out of this book are the ones who use it as they read and reread the Epistles themselves again and again the only way, as Biblical scholars we know, to mine the thoughts of the Epistles and be led from light to light of faith Which God may communicate through them.

And for this Fr McKenzie is a good guide, encouraging for instance, the kind of maturity that distinguishes between the limitations of the human agent which the inspired writer is and the Divine Message he transmits and using the true restraint of scholarship (often missing in contemporary selfassertive authors in this field). e.g.. in his circumspect statement on the Johaninc authorship: "For good, if not absolutely convincing. reasons the majority of critical opinion doubts the traditional identification of the author".

One small blemish. No heading before paragraph three on page 185, so that one is left to discover that the author is no longer speaking of the Catholic Epistles in general but of the Epistle ofJames in particular.




blog comments powered by Disqus