Page 4, 5th May 1989

5th May 1989
Page 4
Page 4, 5th May 1989 — Disservice to Belloc
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Conservative Party

Share


Related articles

Thatcherism's Rules Not For Belloc

Page 4 from 21st April 1989

Distributism Lives On With Thatcher

Page 8 from 14th April 1989

1 00 Years Of The

Page 6 from 2nd June 2000

Ursulines

Page 8 from 7th June 1985

Gibson Tells Political Leaders: Read Belloc

Page 1 from 15th January 2010

Disservice to Belloc

WHILE Professor Sir Alan Harris is a little more cautious in his article (April 14) I feel your headline "Distributism uses on with Thatcher" does a great disservice to Belloc and Chesterton.

Distributism was a cry against the commercialism of life in which men and women became reduced to cogs in a machine manipulated by the financiers. Far from halting this process, Thatcherism has encouraged it, backed up by handsome donations from the big financiers to the Conservative Party.

The distributist ideal of families owning much of the physical property necessary for life has little in common with the Thatcherite ownership of share certificates. The sale of council houses looks a little more distributist, but Belloc and Chesterton could hardly approve of the massive mortage debts which are the reality of homeownership today, nor of the way in which we are encouraged to see housing as an "investment" rather than a home.

I feel Mrs Thatcher would rest a lot less easily if there were a Belloc or Chesterton alive today, ready to use wit, humour, and a language which is neither patronising nor over-intellectual to point out why her version of distributism is nothing like the real thing.

Matthew Hunt bach London ED




blog comments powered by Disqus