Page 2, 5th February 2010

5th February 2010
Page 2
Page 2, 5th February 2010 — Life groups attack new generation of morning-after pill
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: ProLife Alliance

Share


Related articles

Archbishop's Anger At Killer Pill Plan

Page 1 from 15th December 2000

New Study Casts Doubt On Case For Killer Pill

Page 4 from 14th January 2005

Death Pill Fears Prompt New Calls For Ban

Page 2 from 7th February 2003

Sainsbury's Provokes Ire Over Killer Pill

Page 2 from 23rd August 2002

Pupils Warned Of Pill Dangers

Page 2 from 25th January 2002

Life groups attack new generation of morning-after pill

BY DAVID V BARRETT

THE NEW morning-after pill Ellaone, which can be taken up to five days after sexual intercourse, will raise the rate of unintended pregnancy, according to a pro-life charity.

Joanne Hill, spokeswoman for Life, said: “This new pill will lull women into a false sense of security leading them to believe that their ‘mistake’ will be even easier to rectify than ever before. More casual sex and more unintended pregnancy will inevitably be the result.” Also, the rate of sexually transmitted infections is soaring, and the pill offers no protection against them, she said. By encouraging sex Ellaone will push STI rates even higher. “Secondly, there is no knowing what long-term effect such powerful drugs will have on young women’s reproductive health. To be able to terminate a pregnancy up to five days after intercourse, Ellaone must contain some very powerful drugs indeed,” she said.

“Thirdly, this pill will without doubt act as an abortifacient. It is a means of early abortion and could cause all the same physical and psychological ill-effects as later abortion. Are women and girls being told this and don’t they have the right to know?” Ellaone has been shown to be slightly more potent than the currently available morning-after pill Levonorgestrel in the first three days after sex, but also works in the period between three and five days after sex, when the existing pill does not. But it is only available on prescription, so it is unlikely to replace the existing morning-after pill which is available from chemists.

But pro-life activists are even more opposed to it than they are to Levonorgestrel.

Josephine Quintavalle of the ProLife Alliance said: “If you take a morning-after pill within 24 hours there is always the argument that the sperm may not have fertilised the egg by then, meaning pregnancy has not yet happened. But if this pill works for five days there is no argument. This is not a contraceptive, it is an abortive agent.” But researchers claim that the new drug works by delaying the release of an egg.




blog comments powered by Disqus