Page 7, 31st January 1936

31st January 1936
Page 7
Page 7, 31st January 1936 — TIME!
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Bradford, Doncaster, Leeds

Share


Related articles

Gunfire In Wales For The Last Lap Of The Papal Tour Of...

Page 7 from 2nd April 1982

Surely Europe Is Big Enough For Us All..

Page 4 from 27th January 1956

Rdouglas Hyde's

Page 4 from 17th January 1958

Missions Schema Rejected

Page 1 from 13th November 1964

Yorkshire Dales Diary

Page 10 from 1st June 1973

TIME!

GENTLEMEN PLEASE

Ten o'clock or ten-thirty as the dosing-hour--that is the question which will be the subject of a keen tussle at the forthcoming Brewster Sessions throughout Yorkshire.

Thirty-two areas have the privilege of closing at 10.30, 52 areas have to observe the 10.0 o'clock rule.

"The trade" in Leeds, Bradford and Doncaster is applying for the extra halfhour.

Not only will this be opposed by temperance organisations, but the latter are carrying the war into the enemy's ramp by opposing the half-hour extension which is already in vogue in other areas.

The extra half-hour has given rise to a curious situation.

Leeds and Bradford close at 100, but the surrounding area has the benefit of an extra half-hour, and there is an exodus over the city boundary each night to take advantage of the extension.

The " Rush " Hour

Harrogate "waters" have a special attraction during that extra thirty minutes, and that is why so many Leeds and Bradford motor-cars may be seen racing homewards between 10.30 and 11.0 at night.

The "man in the street" is of the opinion that all licensed houses should observe the same closing-time.

While he considers 10.0 o'clock late enough, he does not see why "the other fellow" should have the extra half-hour, and believes that the urge to take advantage of it by those outside the area is responsible for excessive drinking in the rush period and—what is much more important—increased risk "on the road."




blog comments powered by Disqus