Page 2, 29th March 1946

29th March 1946
Page 2
Page 2, 29th March 1946 — COUNTY
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Surrey, Leeds

Share


Related articles

County Elections Alderman W. Wall, And Councillors N....

Page 7 from 22nd April 1949

Danes Throw Out The Reds

Page 1 from 24th March 1950

Mr. De Valera Nominates His Own Opponents

Page 11 from 8th April 1938

H.c.c. Candidate

Page 7 from 20th November 1959

1 The Litmus Test For Labour's Election Chances

Page 5 from 15th May 1981

COUNTY

COUNCIL ELECTIONS

Sut.--The lesson Df the County Council elections sbould be (a) the vulnerability of County Coundl candidates to organised representation in view of the low percentage polls, (b) the lack of cd-ordinated C.P.E.A. representation 01 ributable largely to the failure to consulidate the movement tinder a National Directive Secretariat, (c) that, as few elected County Councillors have gone hack briefed with the Catholic ease, and as economy of the rates is everywhere the leit-motif. we shall only get 50 per cent. instead of 75 per cent. for our Speoial Agreement Secondary Schools and rto improvement on the school fares position. Leeds did something, Southwark also; hut how many others? How many Catholics indeed understand that what betterment we can get over the schools position at the moment ties not with Parlinment nor borough councils, hut with the county councils C.P.E.A. effort over the last twelve months has been in the disproportionate and reverse order of Parliamentary elections, borough elections and, last and very much least, county council elections. The corrective direction which could have come from a central organisation well versed in all electoral matters has not for some reason-perhaps good, hut certainly not understood come from any higher authority.

PAUL O'DONNELL.

Richmond, Surrey.




blog comments powered by Disqus