Page 13, 29th January 2010

29th January 2010
Page 13
Page 13, 29th January 2010 — Changing Confession
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

We Need To Confess

Page 13 from 8th January 2010

Consistent Teaching

Page 13 from 5th February 2010

Fatal To The Cause From Mr Donal Antlwny Foley Sir

Page 11 from 1st August 2008

Forgiven By God

Page 13 from 11th December 2009

Darwin’s Legacy

Page 13 from 27th March 2009

Changing Confession

From Mr Philip J Butler SIR – Donal Anthony Foley’s response (January 8) to my letter on the practice of Confession (December 11) quite fails to address the issues I raised.

Apart from his questionable way of reading Scripture and the intentions of Christ, he seems to assume, as people usually do, that the way we are used to doing things must be the right way and the only way and that it can never be changed. This completely ignores historical development and the fact that auricular confession is a latecomer on the scene.

If the Church has the authority to pronounce God’s forgiveness of our sins it could decide to exercise that authority in any number of ways, eg through general absolution. Since most Catholics will no longer practise Confession in the way popes want them to, would it not be sensible to offer them another way that will really answer their needs? The sabbath is made for man, after all, not man for the sabbath – so too the sacraments.

Yours faithfully, PHILIP BUTLER London N10




blog comments powered by Disqus