Page 3, 28th January 1955

28th January 1955
Page 3
Page 3, 28th January 1955 — Pictures in Church: 228
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Face To Face With Past Expressions

Page 8 from 14th August 1992

Holbein Was The Rage In

Page 6 from 12th January 1951

Art

Page 5 from 11th December 1936

Painting Kings In 'barren' England

Page 12 from 13th October 2006

Art

Page 3 from 10th September 1937

Pictures in Church: 228

11117 Ipo!r.plyil.111R#1.F1111!IIIIIIIPIPP,r!!'!"!,1"1

TWO painters, Michael Pacher and Hans Holbein the elder carried German paintcentury right into the established age of realism of the 16th century.

Michael Pacher in a remarkable altarpiece at Wolfgang, used all the Italian discoveries of perspective and used them with the convictions of one long accustomed to their effect. The self-conscious, rather tentativ, efforts of Lukas Moser are far removed from the sure, calculated attack on the viewer's sensibility put up by Pacher. Indeed .Pitcher's abrupt foreshortenings in his paintings have the same dramatic. vital, rather nervous impact that are given in his sculptures by the traditional g sharp-edged folds of drapery

and the exaggerated gesture.

In the painting illustrated St. Wolfgang, himself incommoded by his croeier, has engaged an indignant devil to hold his missal open while he reads it.

This remarkable devil, convincing enough to have a real existence. is like an animal that one might expect to meet in the Zoo. The thin, high legs and the sinewy body, surmounted by a diver's helmet of a head which is made ridiculous (in the White Knight manner) rather than ferocious by a set of antlers screwer into the ttm, is not an intimidating figure hot a slightly disgusting one. He has more of the feeling of vermin about him than of lion. and most of all he resembles a goat-a slightly laughable animal.

Iris Conlay




blog comments powered by Disqus