Page 13, 27th March 2009

27th March 2009
Page 13
Page 13, 27th March 2009 — Cardinal Pell and the meaning of Vatican II
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Organisations: Oxford University
People: Freddy Langton
Locations: Rome

Share


Related articles

Surge Of Betting Interest In Cardinal Pell

Page 2 from 5th October 2007

Facing East Together

Page 13 from 3rd April 2009

Archbishop Pell Biography Reveals Deep Faultlines In...

Page 1 from 15th November 2002

Cardinal Pell Presides At Ordination

Page 6 from 8th February 2008

Cardinal Pell Speaks On Financial Crisis

Page 5 from 24th October 2008

Cardinal Pell and the meaning of Vatican II

From Mr Kevin O’Neill SIR – I am grateful to Cardinal Pell for articulating a specific teaching of Vatican II to which traditionalists are required to adhere, namely, that a Catholic state cannot compel belief (News feature, March 20).

The ambiguity of the premises underlying this idea are made manifest by your correspondent’s understanding, which I share, that His Eminence, in his recent address at Oxford University, endorsed the concept of “civil partnerships”, ie that the state can positively sanction immorality.

Assuming the accuracy of this understanding, the obvious falseness of this moral conclusion leads me to believe that it is in fact the Cardinal’s interpretation of Vatican II that is in need of revision.

Yours faithfully, KEVIN O’NEILL London E14 From Mr Freddy Langton SIR – Cardinal Pell struggled to name more than a couple of Vatican II teachings to which all Catholics must subscribe. Doesn’t this suggest that the mainstream leadership of the SSPX has a point when it asks Rome for clarification about the Council?

Yours faithfully, FREDDY LANGTON Leeds, West Yorkshire




blog comments powered by Disqus