Page 7, 24th May 2002

24th May 2002
Page 7
Page 7, 24th May 2002 — Waste of resources at UN 'Child Summit'
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Will All This Talk Lead To Nought?

Page 5 from 5th June 1992

End Of The Religious `cold War'?

Page 1 from 4th November 1960

Vatican

Page 4 from 8th June 2001

Christians Urged To Support Third World Mass Lobby

Page 3 from 17th April 1981

From Chelsea To The Tower

Page 7 from 17th July 1953

Waste of resources at UN 'Child Summit'

From Mr Peter Smith Sir, I have recently finished lobbying at the 27th Special Session of the General Assembly on"A World fit for Children" — in plain English the "Child Summit". The first preparatory meeting in the run up to this summit was in Feb 2001. This was just after the inauguration of President George W Bush.

The negotiations were bogged down for countless weeks. At the subsequent meeting in June 2001, a Canadian delegate let the cat out of the bag by saying that the term "reproductive health services" did include abortion. This led to pandemonium in the negotiating room. Then negotiations were held right up to the 10th Sept 2001. They were brought to a sudden halt by the terrorist attacks on the USA the next day.

So some weeks ago negotiations resumed. Again, there was deadlock over abortion related terms in the "Child Summit" document. The EU, Canada, Rio Group (Latin and central American) and a small group of pro-abortion countries led by Liechtenstein, were fighting against the USA, the Holy See and some developing countries (mainly Muslim). However, the US delegates were determined to represent their President to the best of their ability and were successful.

The final document does not promote abortion and many countries put in excellent reservations at the end, affirming the right to life from conception and stating that the family had the primary responsibility for their children.

It is a matter of concern that so much time and money is spent on such conferences : they are just an ideological battleground between conservative and liberal governments. Many millions of children could have been fed and immunised for the cost of such a conference. Instead we have a document that will in all probability benefit no child.

I am so grateful that pro-life President George W Bush is in charge of the USA. Our trust, however, should not be in princes but in the Lord God of the universe who holds the nations in the palm of His hand. I would like to thank the tens of thousands of Christian from around the world who prayed for us at his UN conference.

Yours faithfully PETER SMITH, chief administrative officer at the UN, SPUC




blog comments powered by Disqus