Page 3, 20th November 2009

20th November 2009
Page 3
Page 3, 20th November 2009 — Trust: Balls ignored consultation
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags


Share


Related articles

Sex Education For Primary Schools Dropped

Page 3 from 16th April 2010

How We Lost Control Of Sex Education

Page 9 from 29th January 2010

Government Bypasses Parents On Sex Education

Page 2 from 20th February 2009

Parents ‘will Lose Rights’ Under Sex Education Proposals

Page 3 from 24th July 2009

Ed Balls: Catholic Schools Must Teach Pupils Where They...

Page 1 from 26th February 2010

Trust: Balls ignored consultation

BY ED WEST

THE GOVERNmENT ignored the results of its public consultation into sex education for children before pressing ahead with its proposals against parents’ wishes, it has been claimed.

Ed Balls’s Department of Children, Schools and Families held a public education consultation after announcing plans to make sex education a statutory part of the national curriculum from the beginning of primary school, as part of Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) classes.

The consultation was managed by the Qualifications and Curriculum Development Agency (QCDA) which revealed that over two-thirds of respondents disagreed with making PSHE statutory, and 79 per cent agreed that parents, carers and guardians should be allowed to maintain the right to withdraw their children from sex lessons.

The Government agreed to a public consultation a year ago after an initial review process that had excluded parents.

But, last month the Government commissioned its own questionnaire of 1,791 adults and 1,661 parents, according to Norman Wells of the Family Education Trust’s director, “asked some leading questions aimed at securing a semblance of public support for making PSHE education statutory and for limiting the right of parents to withdraw their children from sex education”.

Mr Wells said the Govern ment chose to give greater weight to the October survey than to the full public consultation. Mr Balls announced earlier this month that it would be compulsory for all pupils aged 15 or over to learn about sex, relationships and drugs, without the need for parental consent, leading the Muslim Council of Britain to announce it would mount a legal challenge against it.

Mr Wells said: “In his determination to impose his own agenda, Ed Balls is going against the fundamental principle in UK education law that parents are responsible for the education of their children and that pupils must be educated in accordance with the wishes of their parents. That responsibility does not cease on a child’s 15th birthday. The Government has no evidence that children who are being withdrawn from sex education classes are at greater risk of teenage pregnancy or sexually transmitted infections and no evidence that imposing sex education on them regardless of their parents’ views will bring any positive benefit.

“We have had 30 years of sex education in secondary schools and it has never been more easy for teenagers to get hold of contraception without their parents knowing, yet we still have the highest teenage conception rates in western Europe and sexually transmitted infection rates have continued to rise.” The Government plans to implement its new policies from September 2011.




blog comments powered by Disqus