Page 4, 19th July 1996

19th July 1996
Page 4
Page 4, 19th July 1996 — Time for disestablishment?
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

People: Charles

Share


Related articles

The One Thing For Diana To Do

Page 10 from 8th March 1996

Marriage Is More Than Promises, Promises...

Page 5 from 19th July 1996

Charles And Camilla Should Be Forgiven, Not Judged

Page 11 from 11th November 2005

How Far Can The Bishops Go?

Page 4 from 23rd May 1986

A Dutiful And Principled Decision

Page 6 from 15th February 2002

Time for disestablishment?

THE CURRENT DIVORCE proceedings concerning the Prince and Princess of Wales are significant not only for their possible constitutional implications such as whether it matters if the people will accept Prince Charles as future King but for what they tell us about the spiritual leadership the House of Windsor is expected to provide. They are not just the breeding stock for the monarchy but for that rather odd hereditary position, the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. What does it mean that the current Governor, the Queen, has virtually ordered the divorce when her Church, if anything, is in theory even more devoted to marriage-forlife than we are (it does not have annulment and is in at least two minds about remarriage in church)? Now senior members of the Synod are voicing serious doubts as to the spiritual and moral fitness of Prince Charles to inherit the governorship. There could be a way out that would set Anglicans free to worry about more important things: disestablishment of the Church of England. It is time that debate was re-opened.




blog comments powered by Disqus