THE CURRENT DIVORCE proceedings concerning the Prince and Princess of Wales are significant not only for their possible constitutional implications such as whether it matters if the people will accept Prince Charles as future King but for what they tell us about the spiritual leadership the House of Windsor is expected to provide. They are not just the breeding stock for the monarchy but for that rather odd hereditary position, the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. What does it mean that the current Governor, the Queen, has virtually ordered the divorce when her Church, if anything, is in theory even more devoted to marriage-forlife than we are (it does not have annulment and is in at least two minds about remarriage in church)? Now senior members of the Synod are voicing serious doubts as to the spiritual and moral fitness of Prince Charles to inherit the governorship. There could be a way out that would set Anglicans free to worry about more important things: disestablishment of the Church of England. It is time that debate was re-opened.
Page 4, 19th July 1996
19th July 1996
Page 4
Page 4, 19th July 1996
— Time for disestablishment?
Close
Report an error
Noticed an error on this page?If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.
Tags
People:
Charles
Share
Related articles
The One Thing For Diana To Do
Page 10 from 8th March 1996
Marriage Is More Than Promises, Promises...
Page 5 from 19th July 1996
Charles And Camilla Should Be Forgiven, Not Judged
Page 11 from 11th November 2005
How Far Can The Bishops Go?
Page 4 from 23rd May 1986
A Dutiful And Principled Decision
Page 6 from 15th February 2002
Time for disestablishment?
Keywords:
Family Law, Marriage, Catholic Marriage, Divorce, Christian Views Of Divorce, Annulment, Church Of England, Anglicanism, Charles, Prince Of Wales, Disestablishmentarianism, Princess Of Wales, Human Interest, Religion / Belief
blog comments powered by Disqus










