Page 7, 16th July 1999

16th July 1999
Page 7
Page 7, 16th July 1999 — What can he say?
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

Locations: Brighton

Share


Related articles

In The Dock From Fr Anthony Dykes Sir, Brian Brindley

Page 7 from 23rd July 1999

Did Brindley Nod?

Page 7 from 9th July 1999

O'casey And The Unity Theatre From Sean O'casey

Page 6 from 7th January 1938

Defending Mormonism

Page 7 from 1st September 2000

The Neglect Of Latin

Page 9 from 5th February 1999

What can he say?

From Mr Brian Brindley Sir, The Revd Anthony Dykes is not a fair critic. He puts the words "the language of the Renaissance" in inverted commas, implying that I used them; I did not. Nor did I say that ecclesiastical Latin was demotic; I said it was a vernacular, i.e. "the language or dialect of a particular country" (COD). I mentioned Dante merely to indicate the period at which the Italian language became settled (though I am under the impression that La Divina Commedia was written in it) and Milton not as an advocate of the vernacular but a fluent writer of Italian.

The eccentricity of Fr Dyke's opinions is illustrated by his assertion that "the most famous British writer of the period" of Shakespeare was the epigranunist John Owen, about whom most of your readers would have to say "Who?". To quote (accurately) Fr Dykes, "What can I say?".

Yours faithfully, BRIAN BRINDLEY, Brighton, Sussex.




blog comments powered by Disqus