Page 2, 16th August 1963

16th August 1963
Page 2
Page 2, 16th August 1963 — REPLY TO MISS ODDIE
Close

Report an error

Noticed an error on this page?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it.

Tags

People: Oddie

Share


Related articles

Letters To The Editor William Oddie 'on Dangerous Ground'

Page 4 from 9th August 1996

Finding Through Your Partner The Post

Page 8 from 18th October 1963

The Strange Case Of An Ecumenism That Would Not Die

Page 4 from 26th February 1999

Chesterton: Faithful To The Child He Used To Be

Page 15 from 12th December 2008

Leading Vicar Converts To Catholicism

Page 3 from 18th January 1991

REPLY TO MISS ODDIE

I feel bound to agree—as any priest must—with some of the remarks made by Miss Oddie in her letter to the Ceramic: HERAT when she refers to the (abstract) desirability of any child being reared and loved in a real home rather than an "Institution".

I must also fully agree with her that much more could be done. especially by certain Local Authorities, to help suitable people to foster children, even children with physical handicaps.

I do, however. feel that her idea that it is possibly "wrong to cootribute to the cost of Catholic children in Catholic Institutions" is more than a little wide of the mark. The only effect of closing the many excellent Catholic Homes and Institutions would he to relegate Catholic children to the already overcrowded State Institutions.

In our Diocese. and elsewhere, many Catholic homes are showpieces for the Local Authorities themselves, and these Authorities describe their own Homes as our 'poor relations', aiming in their ten-year development plans to reach the point in child training and care which we have often already achieved or passed!

All homes which are registered have the 'safeguards of Local County Council inspection' anyway and although many of the local authorities whom we deal with in the South of England are really excellent, some most definitely are not and seem positively to hinder any effort to place a Catholic child in Catholic care particularly, from our own painful experience, where that child is handicapped in any way, and even where the child is in need of care owing to exposure to very grave moral dangers.

Miss Oddie raises many points in her letter, covering as she does questions about the fostering of normal and of physically handicapped children, their care in Homes and Institutions, and related points. The problems of child care cannot he solved by her "foster-the-lot" philosophy though.

If her main point is that the day of the big Institution as a place for the care of children is largely over, then of course we all very much agree (but she is shooting at an extremely dead duck!) If she claims that the days of Catholic Homes are over then I am afraid that she is being at least rather "starry-eyed", particularly in the case of the care of the handicapped child whose lot would in practice be very much worsened by any move to do other than increase the present Catholic provision for specialised care, an increase which is now taking place very largely because of the support and encouragement of many Local Authorities and non-Catholic organisations who admire and wish to help in our work.

(Rev. Fr.) D. A. Paterson.

B.A., M.I.Biol., Southwark Diocesan Director for Handicapped children and Director of the Society of St. Bernadette.




blog comments powered by Disqus